Banks Likely to Find Other Sources of Revenue

By
YOUNG MONEY Staff
3 November 2011
Consumer advocates have cast the reversal, capped by the announcement on Tuesday by Bank of America, as a victory over corporate greed. While that conception might be overly dramatic and confrontational, it does accurately represent the fact that banks were responding solely to pressure from consumers.
However, MarketWatch notes that a report from Javelin Strategy and Research estimates the banking sector's losses from the recent Dodd-Frank reforms at $6.6 billion from reduced debit card transaction fees and $5.6 billion from other regulatory compliance costs. That amounts to $12.2 billion that banks expect they must raise somewhere in order to meet their expected costs.
"When banks have their revenue streams cut in one area, they will find a way to make up for that in another area, and it is always the consumer who pays for it," Bill Hardekopf, chief executive of LowCards.com, told the news source.
CNN suggests other routes that banks might attempt include anything from raising existing fees and interest rates to reducing the returns on deposits, all of which would be less likely for consumers to protest.
Tag Cloud
Beck Bamberger
career
career coach
Careers
collection agency
credit card
credit report
credit score
debt
debt consolidation
debt counseling
Derek Hoffman
employment
entrepreneur profile
Entrepreneurship
Facebook
financial literacy
find a job
get out of debt
health insurance
internet scams
Investing
Laura Tirello
life coach
marketing
Mike Michalowicz
Money Management
new company
paying for college
personal finance
recession
save money
saving money
Shopping
social media
start a business
student loans
the edge
Toilet Paper Entrepreneur
Travel
unemployment
video
Wall St Cheat Sheet
young entrepreneur
young entrepreneurs
Financial help Center







